Since we were talking methods..and other stuff

I just bought Zygmunt Bauman‘s “Identity” book and was reading the introduction by Benedetto Vecchi. I really liked the way Vecchi described Bauman’s method. …the methodology he brings to bear on the subject aims above all to ‘reveal’ the myriad connections between the object under investigation and other manifestations of life in human society. Indeed,Continue reading “Since we were talking methods..and other stuff”

Is it simply the nature of digital research?

One of the things that struck me during the symposium, is that the majority (although not all) of the research methods we discussed reflected some form of auto-ethnographic work. During a small conversation with Jeffrey Bardzell, I proposed that it was because of the nature of digital research – it was done ‘through a computer’.Continue reading “Is it simply the nature of digital research?”

Researching my digital self – whose identity is it anyway?

After hearing the in progress and messy methodological issues of some of my most respected colleagues, I am inspired to get my hands dirty again, eager to move forward with a project I had once felt was methodologically difficult. After Marci Araki’s presentation on Saturday at the T&T symposium, I was reminded of the never-endingContinue reading “Researching my digital self – whose identity is it anyway?”

Trials & Tribulations – an ending with a smile

It is over. The conference – or rather – symposium, that I have been organizing with my colleague, on digital research methods. I would like to post in depth about the presentations and the discussions, but I will do so when I am rested and refreshed. It has been a wonderful marathon. We could notContinue reading “Trials & Tribulations – an ending with a smile”