So I am reading this news article on Yahoo news this morning and as I am reading through it I am astonished at how the article is written. Sure the grammar is fine and the reading flows – but it is the content I am bothered with (and probably a reason why I don’t read very much “international news” these days. The article is supposed to be about two female sailors who were shot on their ship by a colleague (with a third victim in the hospital). The shooting has been cleared of being associated with any act of terrorism. Ok – so we know that this was an “inside” attack – by one of their own. Yet the article dedicates 127 words to the actual news of the deaths and 322 to the history of terroism in the region. I know that perhaps stress due to the environment may or may not have contributed to the deaths, but seeing as it has been ruled out as a terroist act, I find the refocusing on the terroism to be a sad way to divert the attention from the actual crime.
/Sigh
Published by Kelly Boudreau
Associate Professor of Interactive Media Theory & Design at Harrisburg University. I research Digital Games, Play, Sociality, Avatars, Toxicity, and Social Norms & Boundary Keeping. Thoughts and ramblings on this site are my own as I grapple with all the things professional and personal and everything in between. View more posts

I’m never sure whether this media tendency to link isolated issues to current global preoccupations or (dare I say?) trends is to try to show relevancy of why the issue was mentioned in their reports in the first place? Or can it, in some/many situations, be a form of agenda-setting? Given how little media today is truly independant, and how much is in hands of but a few corporations, I suspect it is a bit of both.
I wonder what message people would walk away with from this story you’ve linked? Is it that this was or wasn’t connected to terrorism?
I think it is a diversion tactic. Simply. In a way, saying “one of our soldiers did something terrible” BUT , here are other terrible things that are happening to our soldiers… but I am a skeptic in that way.